<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine Promotion - Page Rank Toolbar, Lets Put it to Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/2006/04/13/search-engine-promotion-page-rank-toolbar-lets-put-it-to-bed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/2006/04/13/search-engine-promotion-page-rank-toolbar-lets-put-it-to-bed/</link>
	<description>UK Online Marketing news and strategies.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BlueSparc – design, technology news &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What is Your Google PageRank?</title>
		<link>http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/2006/04/13/search-engine-promotion-page-rank-toolbar-lets-put-it-to-bed/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueSparc – design, technology news &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What is Your Google PageRank?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/2006/04/13/search-engine-promotion-page-rank-toolbar-lets-put-it-to-bed/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] UK online marketer TH-UK says no, even though Google&#8217;s PageRank is &#8220;still perceived by many to be the yardstick with which to evaluate the importance Google gives to a web page.&#8221; They have come to this answer by setting up an example where a undeveloped domain, a domain with no content, gained a elusive Google PageRank of 5 in only a couple of months. This makes the page seem important to Google even though there is absolutely no content on it. In their conclusion they proclaim: The only use of the PageRank display, would be for people wanting to optimize their site, but if the results the PageRank display gives are inaccurate as demonstrated in the test, then it is of no use to optimizers either. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UK online marketer TH-UK says no, even though Google&#8217;s PageRank is &#8220;still perceived by many to be the yardstick with which to evaluate the importance Google gives to a web page.&#8221; They have come to this answer by setting up an example where a undeveloped domain, a domain with no content, gained a elusive Google PageRank of 5 in only a couple of months. This makes the page seem important to Google even though there is absolutely no content on it. In their conclusion they proclaim: The only use of the PageRank display, would be for people wanting to optimize their site, but if the results the PageRank display gives are inaccurate as demonstrated in the test, then it is of no use to optimizers either. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haunting Thunder</title>
		<link>http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/2006/04/13/search-engine-promotion-page-rank-toolbar-lets-put-it-to-bed/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Haunting Thunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/2006/04/13/search-engine-promotion-page-rank-toolbar-lets-put-it-to-bed/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Page Rank Considered Harmfull&lt;/strong&gt;

At TH UK We did some interesting reasearch into the usefull ness or not of the Google Page Rank display.
&#160;A lot of SEO professionals realise that the tools means nothing but not so the wider internet comunity.
Some comentry on the results of of re...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Page Rank Considered Harmfull</strong></p>
<p>At TH UK We did some interesting reasearch into the usefull ness or not of the Google Page Rank display.<br />
&nbsp;A lot of SEO professionals realise that the tools means nothing but not so the wider internet comunity.<br />
Some comentry on the results of of re&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
