<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>TH UK Media - Online Marketing Blog &#187; FTSE 250 Accessibity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/category/ftse-250-accessibity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>UK Online Marketing news and strategies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:27:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; TH UK Media - Online Marketing Blog 2011 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>webdev@thuk.co.uk (TH UK Media - Online Marketing Blog)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webdev@thuk.co.uk (TH UK Media - Online Marketing Blog)</webMaster>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>UK Online Marketing news and strategies.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>TH UK Media - Online Marketing Blog</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>TH UK Media - Online Marketing Blog</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>webdev@thuk.co.uk</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/podpress/powered_by_podpress.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>FTSE 250 Co&#8217;s Not Accessible</title>
		<link>http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/2006/12/06/ftse-250-cos-not-accessible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/2006/12/06/ftse-250-cos-not-accessible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTSE 250 Accessibity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TH UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/2006/12/06/ftse-250-cos-not-accessible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FTSE 250 companies&#8217; websites are slowly edging towards meeting the minimum legal Accessibility requirements. FTSE 250 companies seem to be discarding the financial incentives of making their websites available to an audience, estimated at having an annual spend of £80bn. B2B consultants Front of Mind&#8217;s survey of the FTSE 250 companies websites, highlight that just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FTSE 250 companies&#8217; websites are slowly edging towards meeting the minimum legal Accessibility requirements.</strong></p>
<p><img align="left" title="Web Accessibility" id="image128" alt="Web Accessibility" src="http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/AccessibilityIcon.thumbnail.jpg" />FTSE 250 companies seem to be discarding the financial incentives of making their websites available to an audience, estimated at having an annual spend of £80bn.</p>
<p>B2B consultants Front of Mind&#8217;s survey of the FTSE 250 companies websites, highlight that just 22% now meet the criteria for Accessibility level &#8216;A&#8217; &#8211; an increase of 12% on June 2006.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a snapshot of the statistics;</p>
<p>* 48.7% of pages failed to meet the minimum standard, compared with;<br />
* 8.65% of central government websites<br />
* 25.9% of FTSE 100 websites<br />
* 97.4% failed to meet the recommended standard<br />
* 80.6% of all pages served by FTSE 250 companies showed code failures<br />
* No information technology company websites achieved a Top 40 ranking</p>
<p>Bottom of the table for overall performance was 888.com, a surprising result for a company that relies solely on an online presence.</p>
<p><strong>TOP WEBSITES FOR ACCESSIBILITY</strong><br />
Daily Mail &#038; General Trust<br />
Northumbrian Water Group<br />
Rentokil Initial<br />
Sthree<br />
Berkeley Group UTS<br />
Ladbrokes<br />
Dana Petroleum<br />
Venture Production</p>
<p><strong>TOP 10 FOR OVERALL PERFORMANCE</strong><br />
Daily Mail &#038; General Trust<br />
Northumbrian Water Group<br />
Venture Production<br />
IG Group HDGS<br />
Electra Investment Trust<br />
Rentokil Initial<br />
Dana Petroleum<br />
Amlin<br />
Rightmove<br />
Scottish Investment Trust</p>
<p>Unsurprisingly, several sites that deliver the most accessible content also appear on the list of those that perform best overall for function, performance and code quality. Websites that are level ‘A’ compliant inevitably work more efficiently and offer more delivery options.</p>
<p>Northumbrian Water was overtaken as the top site for overall performance by the re-listing of Daily Mail &#038; General Trust in the 250 from the FTSE 100, where it had held number one position.</p>
<p>The most improved performer was the website of oil and gas company Venture Production; www.vpc.co.uk rose from 151st for overall performance to 3rd.</p>
<p>The latest survey, commissioned by web consultancy Front of Mind and carried out using SiteMorse™ automated testing software, also looked at the overall function, performance and compliance (HTML, accessibility) of websites from a user perspective. To compile the report, more than 31m tests were carried out across the sites and over 5,000 PDF files were reviewed.</p>
<p><strong>PERFORMANCE SNAPSHOTS</strong></p>
<p>Most functional failings: Taylor Nelson Sofres<br />
Poorest code: 888 Holdings<br />
Fastest response time: Alliance Trusts<br />
Biggest fall: Ultra Electronic Holdings (-174)</p>
<p><strong>BOTTOM FIVE &#8211; OVERALL PERFORMANCE</strong></p>
<p>Spirent<br />
RPS Group<br />
Taylor Nelson Sofres<br />
888 Holdings (WI)<br />
Qinetiq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thuk.co.uk/blog/2006/12/06/ftse-250-cos-not-accessible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

